Has the petitioner been deprived of due process?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Has hate and "community condemnation" of sex crimes deprived the petitioner of due process as seen in the following presented issues: WAS THE VIOLATION OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER PREJUDICIAL ENOUGH TO GRANT A MISTRIAL AND ; WAS IT INTENTIONAL THUS VIOLATING THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS? DID THE USE OF FALSE TESTIMONY VIOLATE THE PETITIONER'S RIGHTS IN TRIAL AND DID THE RESPONDENT ANDTHE COURT OF APPEALS DENIE THE PETITIONER DUE PROCESS ON APPEAL? DID THE PROSECUTOR INTENTIONALLY ALTER THE PETITIONER'S INTERVIEW WITH ALASKA STATE TROOPERS IN ORDER TO SWAY THE JURY, THUS VIOLATING THE PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS? HAS ALASKA MISAPPLIED FEDERAL CASE LAW REGARDING MIRANDA TO ALASKAN CASES SINCE : : 1981, AND DID THIS MISAPPLICATION OF CASE LAW DENIE THE PETITIONER OF DUE PROCESS? WAS THERE PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, AND WAS IT EGREGIOUS ENOUGH TO DENIE THE PETITIONER DUE PROCESS? And if this trend is allowed to continue will it hurt all criminal defendants in this situation here in the United States?