No. 19-6655
Terrence Leonard Mathis v. United States
IFP
Tags: certiorari criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rights detention due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus interrogation rehaif-standard rehaif-v-united-states remand right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 189 S. Ct. 2191 (2019)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW | 1. Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, | and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 189 S. : | Ct. 2191 (2019). | 2. Whether Mr. Mathis’s Fifth Amendment rights were violated when law enforcement officers detained and interrogated him without counsel even | though he repeatedly asked for a lawyer? i | / ' | , | | | | | | | | | | ; | | INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-18
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Terrence Mathis
Robin Farnsworth — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Robin Farnsworth — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent