No. 19-6662
Shane E. Jones v. United States
IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act criminal-procedure judicial-determination jury-trial sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-right statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the judicial determination of crimes committed on occasions different from one another" at sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the judicial determination of crimes 'committed on occasions different from one another' at sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial?
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-17
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-12-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 17, 2020
2019-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 18, 2019 to January 17, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Shane Jones
Stephen Carl Moss — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent