No. 19-6662
Shane E. Jones v. United States
IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act criminal-procedure judicial-determination jury-trial sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-right statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the judicial determination of crimes 'committed on occasions different from one another' at sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the judicial determination of crimes “committed on occasions different from one another” at sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial? i
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-17
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-12-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 17, 2020
2019-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 18, 2019 to January 17, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Shane Jones
Stephen Carl Moss — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent