No. 19-6667

James Anthony Brown v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-sentencing due-process equal-protection gender-discrimination habeas-corpus statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a United States citizen shall be held in prison for an enhanced sentence that is constitutionally wrong, and whether there shall be a gross disparity between women and men offenders subjected to the identical same sentencing enhancements that has been substantially proven should never have been applied in the initial sentencing?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER A UNITED STATES CITIZEN SHALL BE HELD IN PRISON FOR AN ENHANCED SENTENCE THAT IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG, AND WHETHER : THERE SHALL BE A GROSS DISPARITY BETWEEN WOMEN AND MEN OFFENDERS SUBJECTED TO THE IDENTICAL SAME SENTENCING ENHANCEMENTS THAT HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY PROVEN SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN APPLIED IN THE ; INITIAL SENTENCING? : : . . -i, . | . . ' .

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

James A. Brown
James Anthony Brown — Petitioner
James Anthony Brown — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent