No. 19-6692

Kenneth Robert Simpson v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation constitutional-rights double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus judicial-discretion parole revocation sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the revocation of supervised release and imposition of additional imprisonment for a violation of the conditions of supervised release violates the Double Jeopardy Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : er AL UBSO lag NAC bh mecorsed 3 e\eooze puoke CO en Wr 2 Serarore OSCAS1O é n nh i ect! pustiiutanabiiu oC & 2°28 , Jara ) n rams) . ° q g d Hao Kt A roeCuced to. actlindes, those allernos, wo cica nina him ¢ er 6 gtobiire AC pant: earl Consbtibianenl hs ; _ pe oe & 419. Sein Cy recutts me ece nk 2 CAC e © of ret, AEA OD ten arcicess. Clial le aa ae el the ; 1 " N : J oO ; Cour tE.haidimne on Horenacd?, ca ; ae L. pe ae A) As & RC poseso nein penadéen in o senha ite Reo 0 clea oe hic eue avers Tye Doulsie Jemparrlu 0 louse ond tractoenal parale prince wsles att deerrihectins __Herumress cf Pere’ ceim posi tone Jol relense under thy ects hes aethce ce eco! under —_—theoraimos yur uerbicher plea Pe Doeedtdremand 6 movitinns of the GO nee < of Se “ats ¢ Leelonge” catt the vem & OLS e : sth Wa e, Waa¥s) e0s.e uit Ot fan? Pree tho acthice Fircpeatedlis vralatin aot t+ Dus cece, throgien the ¢ 2 donoe re even Ci teen oni he done tus vent ot a time2 ; __ o ma s oe € ut ten i ae f tunitu (Se vest tortion e. Hae “ad we: » we t ane ryt ® pelt elt t 14 =" 7 . ~ fa) 7 ° the mriainalermoe ceauirea ay iti En ee re Aeleasoe : /s ‘ . Op nrens Belews. ; . : l sumedicton Consiviichonal ond Gotrtoe: Feet sions ; ES (Face treat Bociecs councl 3 Reasons tothe Merk Tile of xhe Cote is pettan exo use toleclne tr caccectly only tho lars. 5 ° Saas) OT Tr BRSRACW) is as maconstitrionalas (ky 7 (TE Cote or pecpetiaMrelegge tinder te Meet sentence of Cle) : 7 alse unconstitutienel . TW, Os ceiease “ecliect eto erigivn epitenrne anraliows malchina tion ot an the oes mo, ancl rpalent yous lato Hie rroliite caree chal lenges aswell, Conclinsion 12 ee Taney ae lspendac CS, : Apeendiy QO. Az div Q Sth Circurt's. denial of Oppoal eee NR ee SaaS nnn IRnEReeen

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2019)

Attorneys

Kenneth Robert Simpson
Kenneth Simpson — Petitioner
Kenneth Simpson — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent