No. 19-6700
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: advisement appellate-review district-court right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment standard-of-review waiver
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals applied an incorrect standard in concluding that Petitioner knowingly and intelligently waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, even though the District Court never advised him of any specific risks and disadvantages of self-representation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals applied an incorrect standard in concluding that Petitioner knowingly and intelligently waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, even though the District Court never advised him of any specific risks and disadvantages of
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2019)
Attorneys
Abid Naseer
James E Neuman — James E. Neuman, P.C., Petitioner
James E Neuman — James E. Neuman, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent