No. 19-6708

Daniel Wert v. Ronnie R. Holt, Warden

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2241 actual-innocence administrative-remedy atypical-and-significant-hardship atypical-hardship civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-jurisdiction due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction sandin-v-conners section-2241 standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court had jurisdiction over the actual-innocence claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241, even though no good time credit was taken, but only a loss of privileges which imposed atypical and significant hardship on the Petitioner

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED ; A Writ of Certiorari should be granted to address the important and novel question of whether the district court had jurisdiction over the actual-innocence claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section : : 2241, even though no good time credit was taken, but only a loss: of privileges which imposed atypical and significant hardship on . : Petitioner. Sandin v. Conners, 515 U.S. 472 (1995). SUBJECT , PAGE QUESTION. i) JURISDICTION. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION. STATEMENT OF THE NS A. THE INCIDENT REPORT.seseessses

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent Ronnie R. Holt, Warden to respond filed.
2019-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Daniel Wert
Daniel Wert — Petitioner
Daniel Wert — Petitioner
Ronnie R. Holt, Warden
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent