No. 19-6709

Adam L. Acosta v. Colorado

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2019-11-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-35 disclosure ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-for-new-trial new-trial prosecution rule-16 rule-16-disclosure rule-33 rule-33-motion-for-new-trial rule-35
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals misconstrued Rule 35(c)(3)(VID, Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals misconstrued Rule 35(c)(3)(VID, Colorado Rules of . Criminal Procedure, in declining to consider a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel raised by the putatively ineffective attorney in Rule 33 motion for new trial and submitted | an affidavit in which he swore that he made a mistake in the remedy he requested for a Rule 16 disclosure of prosecution? . ;

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Colorado to respond filed.
2019-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Adam L. Acosta
Adam L. Acosta — Petitioner
Adam L. Acosta — Petitioner
Colorado
L. Andrew CooperOffice of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
L. Andrew CooperOffice of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent