No. 19-6714
Keith D. Goodman v. Eddie Pearson, Warden
IFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure civil-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-district-court habeas-corpus procedural-rule section-2254 sentence-aggregation sentencing sentencing-calculation statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a federal district court (or a § 2254 petitioner) permitted to disregard or evade Rule 2(e) (of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts) when a challenge is made to the administrative execution of the aggregate calculation of sentences from more than one court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Is a federal district court (or a § 2254 petitioner) permitted to disregard or evade Rule 2(e) (of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts) when a challenge is made to the administrative execution of the aggregate calculation of sentences from more than one court? ii .
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Keith D. Goodman
Keith D. Goodman — Petitioner