No. 19-6720
James Dwayne Myers v. United States
IFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure divisibility divisibility-analysis eighth-circuit jury-unanimity mathis-standard mathis-v-united-states sentencing-enhancement state-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a court properly apply the divisibility analysis prescribed in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), without considering the question of jury unanimity?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW May acourt properly apply the divisibility analysis prescribed in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), without considering the question of jury unanimity? ii
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-02-21
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-01-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 21, 2020.
2020-01-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2020 to February 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2020.
2019-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 23, 2019 to January 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)
Attorneys
James Myers
Christopher Aaron Holt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Christopher Aaron Holt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent