No. 19-6731
Travell Henry v. Patrick Warren, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel investigation right-to-counsel self-incrimination sixth-amendment trial-strategy witness witness-testimony
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Mr. Henry's trial counsel, Patrick Nyenhus, failed to provide constitutionally effective assistance of counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WAS MR. HENRY'S TRIAL COUNSEL, PATRICK NYENHUS, FAILED TO PROVIDE CONSTITIUTIONALLY EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL? A). Counsel was ineffective when he failed to investigate and/or then call Ms. Stewart's husband to testify. B). Counsel was ineffective when he asked the Petitioner to first give a statement to the police without any consideration, and then to testify, which only served to bolster the prosecutor's case and may have led to other evidence which appeared incriminating.
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-23
Waiver of right of respondent Patrick Warren, Warden to respond filed.
2019-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Patrick Warren, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Travell Henry
Travell Nicolas-Alfonzo Henry — Petitioner