No. 19-6732

Martin Stanley Ivie v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2019-11-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process evidence-tampering false-arrest false-evidence perjury police-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct state-misconduct wrongful-conviction
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. QUESTIONS OF LAW

1. Is it legally pormisaible for State officials to use spurious evidence that is proven unenimously by professionel forensic enalysis to be forged in order to lereete conviotion'l of a Us Citizen?

2. Is it legally permissible for State offioials to conceal abusive police sotions by charging and convioting a Us Citizen for crimes proven to hevs not happened?

3. Is it lsgelly permissible for Stete officials to commit perjury thet diemetricslly opposes polios redio call log and Professional Rallistic Foransic records thet were openly tampered with in order to felsely frame a us Sitizen?

4. Is it legally permissible for State officisls to commit perjury by lying under oeth and concealing proof of thet freud by withholding exculpatory police Pecords and purpoeefully introducing perjured uitnese testimony?

5. Is it legelly permissible for police officers to hsrbor pereonal grudges throughout a multi-year, documented history of ebusive and embarrassing false arrests, and eot out upon thet frustretion by smbushing sn unermed us Citizan in his own private geted community, who is committing no crime, end shooting him and his dog in the back pith en automatic asseult rifle?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether state officials can use forged evidence to convict a U.S. citizen

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Martin Stanley Ivie
Martin Stanley Ivie — Petitioner