Whether state officials can use forged evidence to convict a U.S. citizen

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED per FRle Hi) . i | T. QUESTIONS OF Lay . rn i 1. Ts it legelly parmissible far State officials te use spurious evicence that i is areven unanimously by arafessional forensic analysis to Je forged in order i tc 'ersate conviction! af 4 US Citizen? i 2, Is it legally sermissibls for State afficials to conceal shusiva solica actions by charging and convicting = US Oitizen far crimes araven to have nat : Nasgensd? | ) . { 2. Tea it legally nermissible far State officials to camait parjury that . . diematricslly Opposes oolice radio call tag and Peofessional Sallistic : Foransic pecerds thet were apenly tampered with in ordar te falsely frame 2 US | oitizen? ' Al Ts it legelly nermissibls far Stste OFFicisls ta commit perjury by lying | under aath and concealing proof of that Fraud ay withholding ‘exculpatory : police records and surgesefully introcusiag Barjured witness tastinsny? i : i . 3. Ts it lagally permissible for nolice officers to harbar ssceanal grudges | : Shroughaut a multi-year, documented History of sbusive and amaaerassing false | arrests, and act out upon thet frustratisn Sy ambushing sn unsrmed US Citizen | in his sun srivate gated community, who is committing no crime, end shooting | him and Ais deg in the back with an autametic assault rifle? : i i e 1 ,