No. 19-6733

George R. Durham v. Josh Shapiro, Attorney General of Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence change-in-relevant-decisional-law civil-procedure extraordinary-circumstance federal-rule-of-civil-procedure-60(b)(6) habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mcquiggin-precedent mcquiggin-v-perkins rule-60b6
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court's decision in McQuiggin v. Perkins constitutes a change in relevant decisional law that justifies relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) based on a credible showing of actual innocence and ineffective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Petitioner submits that this Honorable Court;s decision in McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L.Ed. 2d 1019 (2013) was a change in relevant decisional law and is an extraordinary circumstance to justify relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), in light of Petitioner's credible showing of "Actual Innocence" and "Ineffective Assistance of Counsel." i 5 : . vob %

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)

Attorneys

George R. Durham
George M. Durham — Petitioner
George M. Durham — Petitioner