George R. Durham v. Josh Shapiro, Attorney General of Pennsylvania
HabeasCorpus
Whether the Court's decision in McQuiggin v. Perkins constitutes a change in relevant decisional law that justifies relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) based on a credible showing of actual innocence and ineffective assistance of counsel
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Petitioner submits that this Honorable Court;s decision in McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L.Ed. 2d 1019 (2013) was a change in relevant decisional law and is an extraordinary circumstance to justify relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), in light of Petitioner's credible showing of "Actual Innocence" and "Ineffective Assistance of Counsel." i 5 : . vob %