Whether the prosecution of a case by a local district attorney violates due process and equal protection rights when the prosecution is motivated by racial animus and results in disparate treatment of the defendant as a member of a protected class

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED lo ROG et ely prosecution of a CASS by local istnct thor vey shy vk Cause and Affect causing ivr had Prose) havent to [nw _Abich w coe a Mat pvvested on ov glow} 20d 20171 a yey 14 mow thé 2) naoliehig, court.ov c4Se Hy 50 delandaut “Pp ; N ar | by Sfefues of, Ste pol Cotes aioe 8 3) Awethica/ Fevetycas at Loc! Distnet 3 , [tt toaneys oY Mialfeasasce pv Ofse| Abuse powey, oh (ells ON Sth hl ) Comtlicte € Teves} iim P24 ect Var Cc havses pre vy Y DA, S ant 1s Judlgx qfrvor™: 5) Kennova! of “Tia Cyow puta aobt PT onl slice wind wb teinoe is A‘protecteel class pecovelws to Poe Yu's Con sft ont 70 Lowsimn Se ar AP Ov? (ites O 2 i past um ao ve sel Ur Aw Wee we >The a, “Kl we we ayn , 8-27-2019