No. 19-6753
Benitez Auguarius Moody v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affidavit-challenge deliberate-falsehood due-process fourth-amendment franks-v-delaware intentional-falsehoods intentional-falsity probable-cause search-warrant
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the characterization of deliberate falsehoods in a search warrant affidavit as mere imprecision eviscerates the right of a defendant as enunciated in Franks v. Delaware to challenge the validity of a search warrant
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the characterization of deliberate falsehoods in a search warrant affidavit as mere imprecision eviscerates the right of a defendant as enunciated in Franks v. Delaware to challenge the validity of a search warrant. i
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Benitez Auguarius Moody
James Richard Theuer — James R. Theuer, PLLC, Petitioner
James Richard Theuer — James R. Theuer, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent