No. 19-6754

Cesareo Vizcarra Medina v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-11-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment 5th-amendment 6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to prosecutorial misconduct that violated petitioner's constitutional rights under the 6th Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ; 9. Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expenses or in your assets or . .. . Habilities during the next 12-months? ee Ss SO OYes CINo If yes, describe on an attached sheet. 7 : '» 16. Have you paid = oF will you be paying ~ an attorney any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form? [] Yes [JNo : _ If yes, state the attorney’s name, address, and telephone number: . . ° 1. Have you paid—or will you be paying—anyone ‘other than an attorney (such asa paralegal or ' a typist) any money, for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form? "Yes C1 No a : ; : , If yes, how much? . ; . Ifyes, state the person’s name, address, and telephone. number: . : _ 12. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the costs of this ease. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. : : — — , : (Signature) : |= QUESTIONGS) PRESENTED [¥. Teiak Commie wos ineGecrive Soe Gai\ing ta aaiect to te | | Leeascaukoridl miscontuct an viclated Aetenionts! cahis te —_| ffoounce\ unter toe li Amendorent O8 WG. Consittution, | [Secioklond wv Waskinaten, Abe WS. Gli (1884; Welviome ve | WRayio, Sus. Bealanoel Pe ifcesuite o& incentive asaistance o& counsel in viaiation | t[tscoush Sours weil os Sive and Six any Special ciccumes| Constitution Cole v. Arkansas (USE, 227%, UG 8b, 20, | af 2 26 . _ 2] 2

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Cesareo V. Medina
Cesareo V. Medina — Petitioner
Cesareo V. Medina — Petitioner