Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), where what is now an essential element of the § 922(g) crime was not pled and proved beyond a reasonable doubt at trial. 2. Whether the correct interpretation of Rehaif is that a defendant must know of his possession of a firearm and also that he knew he had the relevant status when he possessed it, or that the defendant must know that he possessed a firearm and that he knew he belonged to the relevant category of persons barred from possessing a firearm. ii