No. 19-6758
Michael Tryance Anderson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appellate-standard booker-standard circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection federal-sentencing sentencing-review standing substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of their civil rights and due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTION PRESENTED L. Whether the Eighth Circuit’s substantive reasonableness review satisfies the standards set forth in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), Gail v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007), and 18 U.S.C. § 3742? 2
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael Anderson
Scott F. Tilsen — Fed. Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent