Whether it is constitutionally lawful to deny a pro se litigant access to the courts when obstructed by state officials

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) It is constitutionally lawful to deny a pro se, obstructed by: State Officials, , within the judicial structure and a party to the courts, such as Department of Corrections? 2) Is written deliberation to a jury by a judge; unfairly and or criminally the same as verbal deliberation to a jury? . . 3) Can a court’s and prosecution tag-intag-out team proceeding, corrupt jury’s verdict and the trial itself? S | | 4) Can prosecution misconduct unfair a trial? : 5) It is lawfully allowed for court, prosecution, and public defenderat a pre-trial, to agree to lessen the defendants defense by all agreement? — . 6) Can the hearsay Rule 803(8) against a party opponent the state, in vain a trial? 7) Does the Defendant have to say he was in an open house at his criminal trial to be protected by the law of openness? 8) Does Fla. Rules overrule Constitutional amendments? (such as, 13"pursuit of freedom, 14"due process). 9) Should a commissioned court order request, be forwarded to the judge who commissioned it and bares the heading of that court or withheld? us 10) Cana court give a substantial denial of a pro se, it never reviewed? 2