No. 19-6770
Vinca S. Chiu v. First Group America, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure claim-dismissal due-process judicial-order legal-remedy motion-practice scope-of-relief standing strict-liability summary-judgment trial-court trial-court-authority ultrahazardous-activities
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a trial court authorized to expand the scope of a legal remedy that was not requested in a motion for summary judgment before the court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1. Is a trial court authorized to expand the scope of a legal remedy that was not : requested in a motion for summary judgment before the court? 2. Does a letter issued by a judge constitute an order for the purpose of dismissing a claim? 3. Was Petitioner's claim of strict liability for "ultrahazardous" or "abnormally dangerous" activities dismissed in error by the trial court? : 1
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)