No. 19-6778
Michael Daemon Blackburn v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-waiver criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process fifth-amendment interrogation-rights miranda-rights self-incrimination waiver
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a written-only advisement of Miranda rights -without time or silence to read it - a sufficient advisal allowing a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Is a written-only advisement of Miranda rights -without time or silence to read it a sufficient advisal allowing a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver? i
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael Blackburn
Margaret Ann Katze — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Margaret Ann Katze — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent