Were Petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights violated?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A) Were Petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights violated when appellate counsel failed to: 1) Notify Petitioner (of his appellate rights) in a timely manner of the Ohio appellate court's decision; which thwarted petitioner's ability to file/utilize: a) Ohio Appellate Rules of Procedure #25, "Certify a Conflict;" and/or, b) Ohio Appellate Rules of Procedure #26, "Motion For Reconsideration." 2) File on behalf of his client, this Petitioner, either of the above stated Ohio Appellate Rules of Procedure(s) #25 or #26, when counsel knew or should have known that the Ohio appellate court's decision was blatantly erroneous, while all knowing that both of these "motions" require filing(s) within ten (10) days of the Ohio appellate court's decision and journal: entry? B) Is/are Ohio's Appellate Rules of Procedure(s), i.e., Appellate Rule (Here. ; on out "App. R."), App. R. 26(B)(2)(c) constitutionally valid to deny this Petitioner (and others similarly convicted defendants) his right to effective counsel, and effective review on appeal? C) Is/are Ohio's ten (10) day time-limits (for filing(s)), and/or their inability to accept a "'mail-box" rule constitutionally valid in denying this petitioner (and others similarly convicted defendants) his ability to effectively use his appellate.rights in challenging the Ohio appellate court's decision, especially when their decision is blatantly erroneous, in the attempt to file under the above stated Ohio Appellate Rules of Procedure(s) #25 or #26? ; i