I. The Court of Appeals of Virginia (CAVA) request all documents from Virginia
Workers' Compensation Commission on my appeal. VAWCC withheld sixty-nine (69)
filed documents (from 2014-2017 documenting Respondence disobeying Court
Orders/neglect/abuse) from its Appendix to the CAVA. Carter v. Commonwealth, 2 Va.
App. 392, 396, 345 S.E.2d 5, 7 (1986). Acts calculated to embarrass, hinder or obstruct
court. The questions presented is as follows:
A. Whether VAWCC was unconstitutional in cherry-picking 69 filed documents from
2014-2017, not admitting a complete Appendix to the CAVA, displayed Court and
Respondents bias and case manipulation against my case, if VAWCC five separately
additions to Appendix filings from February 2018 - December 2018 is
unconstitutional?
B. Whether CAVA was unconstitutional in not requesting all VAWCC missing filed
documents, if erred in not reprimanding VAWCC for excluding filed evidence from
Appendix, erred denying my submitted Brief addendum including the missing filed
evidence supporting my case, whether CAVA erred affirming without all court
evidence, and if unconstitutional not admitting all omitted filed case evidence after
my Writ of Certiorari to CAVA requesting missing supporting evidence from court?
C. Whether against the law and/or a Federal Offence?

II. Workers' Compensation laws are against micromanaging and manipulating cases.
The U.S. Code § 9 Prohibition regarding manipulation and false information. Our Court
Ordered Medical Awards are consistently denied often ignored by its own court,
creating a substantial Constitutional question as a determinative issue from these
violations. This matter should be addressed to protect other injured workers nationwide
under our Constitutional and Human Rights from abuse when the court does not. The
questions presented is as follows:
A. Whether Respondents case micromanagement/manipulation, repetitively disobeying
Court Order/Awards, mishandling my health care and going against treating
physicians' medical referrals under an Award are unconstitutional or against rules?
And is this a danger to my health?
B. Whether Respondents-employer Model Home Temps/Next Day Temps/Inga
/Accident Fund, including their counsel (consulting them) involved in case
manipulation from 2014 to present and/or responsible for harmful health decisions?
C. Whether VAWCC fail to protect my writes under the Workers' Compensation rules,
the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission rules, Constitutional or Human
Rights?

III. Medical diagnosis denied, Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome Stage II (CRPS) (old
medical term Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy RSD), Major Depression, Anxiety,
Agoraphobia, Knee Chondromalacia Pateelae. The questions presented is as follows:

A. Whether denying Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS/RSD) Stage II (LifeLong painful injury with contracture of ankle joints) harmful to my health and
recovery stopping medical treatment and prescriptions, unjust, unconstitutional
(right to life), violated rules or Human Rights? With evidence of multiple (5)
physicians (around 100 years of experience) and CAT-SCAN with same diagnose,
including causally relate

Whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia erred in requesting all documents from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission on the petitioner's appeal, when the Commission withheld sixty-nine filed documents from 2014-2017 that documented the respondent's disobedience of court orders, neglect, and abuse