Whether officials can refuse to process inmate grievances and then dismiss a subsequent civil rights lawsuit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . Please See Ney t Page All Eight o¢ The Followiney Questions Below Tnolve The Question of — Under The US. , Constatution is ita Violation F Nuc Process |. Under the rules or PLRA can the ofFicals responsible For the PT CesSinay, oF AN Inmate Ari vanes Por posely Tease to Process Ary Inmate arivance At there Meninistrative . level And then turn Around And Ask that that ramates £1933 complaint be dimiss For Failure to exhaust his Complaint At there oeniaistrative. Leve| When that 1%%3 complaint is based on | the Fach the reagon For Complaining Te , the District Cont Was because te | GFficale At She Prison /\a | where he 1S Makema the Complaint From Are. Tebuseine, to Tespond te The Grivance that he has Filed at there M>min’ strotive. | hevel PC , 24 d. Can the WS. Court oF Appeals use completely False Statements oF Facts Censarnine, the CASE Under review As the FeASon or AS | >. Can aA Marci strate Dadas SAY wa open Court At The Omnibus Hearine, that only the sary CAN make the decision Not this Court” AS to who to belive on the question or exhustion but Hen enter AN oroer A Few months later Withoat A Sary Tria) , dismissing, For Fai lere to exhaust nA U.S. District Court P Ly) When A Peron request Sapena oy Medica | Tecords Ano Video Tecor dings to Support his CASE And provides AFF dayt that there does exsist preor 1 Sapport oF that Sapena request , — can that request yor Sapena be denied in the intrest or ashice a A CLS, District Court ° rm , , &. Can A party Moving, yor Summary Sudagenest | In A CASE be aven More. credability thaca the Non Movinn, Party in A US, Distiect Court P 6. Once A person has been opanted Tr Fourma Papers In A CASE) CAN that person be denied the oppertanity to process On Appeal aa that . , CASE Tn Four Papuris when that PpeTSens Stutus ASA PAparis has ner chanago) throws . out the Process in A LS. Nistret Court % 7. Once x person has requesticn the riabt to A Sary Taal and that request apanted, CAN | , that CASE be decided by A Maroy strate Sade, curth out A Sery witheat the Agreement oy . , both partys in A US. District Court ® : , Filed jaa USS. District Court | CAN the Mast — rate Suda’ Secision For which the En LJho Tesponos AnD rule on that En Bane Motion ° uy oT