Whether counsel's admitted inaccuracy, misinformation, and failure to make specific inquiry regarding the petitioner's prior predicates (ACCA) conflicts with Supreme Court precedent on the effective assistance of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Nationally, where counsel admittingly is inaccurate, misinforms and fails, to make specific inquiry regarding Petitioner's prior prédi--ie-. ’ cates (ACCA) does the lower courts findings that "guessing suffice for effect. assistance of counsel" conflict with Supreme Court precedent. . 2. Should the “original files of the District Court suffice or warrant Appellate Court silence, in denying Certificate of Appealability,. , where Petitioner identifies non existing precedent District Court used _. an reaching findings: : ‘