No. 19-6802

Gary Jackson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-12-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process identification identification-process judicial-circuit jurisdiction precedent sentencing standing supreme-court supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the state courts and federal courts err in determining that the identification process violated Supreme Court precedent?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Did the State of Florida within the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court . in and Broward County, Florida and the Fourth District Court of Appeal as well as the U.S. Southern District Court in and for Broward County, Florida and the U.S. Court of Appeal in Atlanta did erred in their decision determining that the processes which have been conducted in lieu of the law during the identification of the petitioner was in violation of U.S. Supreme Court precedent case law in its entirety? 2) Was the identification process in this case ruled upon in contrast to US. Supreme Court Precedence? 3) Was the second sentence imposed vindictive in nature and contrary to the petitioner’s right to exercise his constitutional rights to enjoy a . public trial within the gambit of his due process? . 2 .

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-05
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Inch to respond filed.
2019-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2020)

Attorneys

Gary Jackson
Gary Jackson — Petitioner
Gary Jackson — Petitioner
Mark Inch
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent