Whether there is pretense that the statutes and laws of the state under which Mr. Gregley is convicted of, are repugnant to the Constitution and laws of the United States?

issues presented in a different manner? F. . Whether Mr. Gregley’s conviction is valid where the jury verdict of two counts of aggravated murder is contrary to law where the jury failed to find elements of the offense and the findings in the verdict form does not constitute the offense? G. Whether Mr. Gregley’s conviction is valid where the jury verdict of attempted aggravated murder is contrary to law; where the jury failed to find all essential elements of the offense; and where the findings in the verdict form does not constitute the offense? H. Whether Mr. Gregley’s conviction is valid where the trial court sentenced him to a three: year mandatory term for the firearm specification under Ohio Revised Code R.C. § 2941.145, where Mr. Gregley was indicted for a six-year firearm specification pursuant to R.C. § 29241. 44? : 1. Whether Mr. Gregley was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel at trial when trial counsel failed to file a motion to suppress witness identification in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? ii