No. 19-6813
Lenore Luann Albert v. State Bar of California
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection excessive-fines legal-costs license license-suspension reinstatement state-bar state-bar-costs
Key Terms:
ERISA Takings DueProcess FifthAmendment Punishment Patent
ERISA Takings DueProcess FifthAmendment Punishment Patent
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the California State Bar's conditional suspension that conditions the time suspended to payment of State Bar costs and other amounts ordered due is Unconstitutional
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the California State Bar’s conditional suspension that conditions the time suspended to payment of State Bar costs and other amounts ordered due is Unconstitutional. Whether the California State Bar’s costs are excessive fines or penalties, and as such Unconstitutional.
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent State Bar of California to respond filed.
2019-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Lenore Albert
Lenore Albert — Law Offices of Lenore Albert, Petitioner
State Bar of California
Robert G. Retana — State Bar of California, Respondent