No. 19-6834
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-922g3 constitutional-vagueness controlled-substance criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-due-process-rehaif-v-united-sta due-process federal-statute judgment-of-acquittal rehaif-v-united-states unlawful-user vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied by the District Court
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LEE HOPE, Petitioner, VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Alexander C. Wharton, Esq. (#26937) Attorney for Petitioner The Wharton Law Firm 1575 Madison Avenue Memphis, TN 38104 Phone: (901) 726-6884 Email: alexanderwharton
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Lee Hope
Alexander C Wharton — The Wharton Law Firm, Petitioner
Alexander C Wharton — The Wharton Law Firm, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent