Whether the lower courts erred in upholding the racial discrimination in jury selection in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . D) Lia rhe Counts b&louwy wndeERmine CAE NCEE — Bit of 7% Count !s Ruljpse~ IN 2A LS ON VA “ _ petucky pyc Flows Vv. Miss -s21pp! j Pht“ V/Oi” . LALINE ALLon CAwho/m Arla TASMUINE TDAchseoy ) tedo : — 20LHOA/ PPR :CBN PINEBICAN TUBDBS Bibl AS wel] 45 phe febtewER'S Riehl wy sd the Sek arid pth BME IUBES of Che LhnutcA Dates Cout1tulion C AL the Dist# el Coust. EBB jy ef dea ? ICONS Uclien pEARbBE Agjd Lwelye ( 12) YH AHALER PAE BiiAL, 20 CLEAN A HAce NEUZRAL EXOMINITION J PAut3 VIO/ATIRN&ECO GOPREWEwb TiB0AS Bith® 4 wet! as gts Jetitionen's UUtchts anders rhe Sk aud p4th amendments vf? he Lfwitead TLD Constitution prof Batson Fe at Io arphacer aideleck. D)DA fpasecutor Farelgir Crees BAce -Neutea/ fy EXYONATION ,"\ Chat Me Ayd yt BELIEVE hap ; Tasme STARSON Aad Extecteh Nf Sx ERIENCE © , 2° ne A AELL8ION OF LA ppenitude! IN CONTA Lo Tustreé rhiupeood Yarshall s LOENCMUAB ANCE. [NM DPALSON Za at. /04-/05 ANd IN VICIAtION OF FTASMINE Jackson's pnd ~ebyt Onee 5 IH and (4% pMEAMNEVE of the lYyyiltd Fees Coystitutr on C | yo, 4) LNB Hi ABLDB ACE LPUEDLION (Nee OF pIOLEN ~ LAY, FiBoR DRBIWUNE TDACKEON IM LOY IPUTISON Zo VictoR LeIkSON ? DEN EPK Tefinson and bak biakeindn , teho ABE wiite Prd sei betel -. Bea tA CHER Aint) CONVINGINE ENOUCA EVI ~ DENCE Po Ext bhhish pRECEM AL L308 70 apace “ sony th. ¥10fLION OF phe DAD pn épet Ene: Of. He waited Sbnt7s Constitution 5)_Pa/ She JowtR Coutts 4 pil. £2 vyphold PAE . Ebcertl. ROLECLION fubhts Of ode FEL tO Aas fesrhetoats phe VIeIBLION of CAE LMA States Ceoryst)tuLioNn x ANA Ahi Bel ipfe ESA JN XCAESON < I |