No. 19-6846
James W. Riley v. Dana Metzger, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal-as-of-right constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-precedent right-to-counsel sixth-amendment standing state-court statutory-analysis third-circuit-court
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where the tril judge failed to revew evidence of trial
coursel's gross misconduct of Fraud identical to the
issues addressed in this Court's decision in iccay v.
Louisiawa Do petitiover possess A right under Mccoy
to Reopen his prior habeas proceedings pursuant to
Rule 60lbs(3& (6) where N0 court Ever revewed the
evidence of counsel's misconduct Necessary for Adjedication
of ineffective Assistance of couusel claims under Seven
(7 Standard of Revieus established by the United States
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel applies to a defendant's first appeal as of right
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-02-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent Warden James T. Vaughn Corr. Center, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2020)
Attorneys
James W. Riley
James W. Riley — Petitioner
Warden James T. Vaughn Corr. Center, et al.