No. 19-6846
James W. Riley v. Dana Metzger, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal-as-of-right constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-precedent right-to-counsel sixth-amendment standing state-court statutory-analysis third-circuit-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel applies to a defendant's first appeal as of right
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ——sauss mhAcesscA os iis Couct's AccSion ins WEtay Vo ——nonssufinaa On petcbiomer Rassess Oe ciaht ushec MCs <—— Brule (00/6) (9% (0) uhece NO core Ever rourewed Mee ~0& wefPeckiue agdistance Of tounsel lacs shee Seven np Sugceme Conch, Thicd Coctasih Court word Shmte Court ease OO eee ee mo a
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-02-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent Warden James T. Vaughn Corr. Center, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Warden James T. Vaughn Corr. Center, et al.