Does any court that does not follow the well established law violate an individual's Constitutional rights by denying a motion or petition without stating the reason?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Does any court that does not follow the well established law violate an individuals Constitutional rights, by simply denying without stating the reason or per curium affirming a . motion or petition that was properly filed? 2. By the Fourth District Court of Appeal denying Petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and the claim of Conflict of Interest deny Petitioner his Due Process rights set out in both the State and Federal Constitutions? 3. Does a Judge that simply adopts the State’s response, and denies a 3.850 motion without taking the time to review each claim and constitutional violation deny Petitioner his Due ~~ Process rights set out in both the State and Federal Constitutions? 4. Does a Petitioner have the right to have a copy of his discovery before trial to know the evidence and witnesses against him and if he does not receive this discovery did it violate his Due Process rights set out in both the State and Federal Constitutions? 5. Does a State witness that gets on the stand and lie violate ones Constitutional rights and if so and Petitioner has raised this claim and it was denied was the Court that denied this claim in error? 6. Does a Petitioner have to proceed all the way to the United State Supreme Court before he can get a Judge to uphold both the State and Federal Constitutions? a) ag { X ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. { ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all