No. 19-6848
Robert Matthew Wittal v. Montana
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: co-defendant-testimony credibility criminal-procedure criminal-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instruction jury-instructions legal-objection sixth-amendment witness-credibility
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel when his counsel objected to a jury instruction on the untrustworthiness of co-defendant testimony without researching the issue?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The states key witnesses at a homicide trial were three charged co-defendants. Petitioner's defense rested upon undermining the credibility of the co-defendants’ accusations against the petitioner. The state offered a jury instruction on legal principals recognizing the untrustworthiness of the codefendants testimony. When petitioner's counsel--without research--objected to the entire instruction, didipdétittonier !réecteve ineffective assistance of counsel?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-16
Waiver of right of respondent Montana to respond filed.
2019-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2020)