Did the Nebraska Board of Pharmacy (NE BOP) err by not acting independently in considering the matter concerning the appellant's pharmacist license on its own merits?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . a 1. Did the Nebraska Board of Pharmacy (NE BOP) erred by not acting independently in considering the matter at hand conceming the appellant’s pharmacist license on its own merits instead of looking at the matter fully to see if the claims of the prosecutors and the court had any actual merit or bearing on this separate matter? : . With regard to licensing pharmacists, the NE BOP are expected to have the expertise and independent agency anid latitude of discretion to access the facts for themselves. This is why civil actions are granted and the real facts of the matter openly discussed and assessed. : The NE BOP of Pharmacy Cannot be a mbber stamp with those previous courts otherwise there would be no need for a separate procedure for this matter; it is entirely within the jurisdiction of this court to access the claims of the government and by the other courts. In this case the government is taking the self-confessed crimes of their witnesses enabling them to shift the blame away from themselves with not other evidence that the assertion of those who confessed their own guilt, yet those witnesses can still practice pharmacy. There is no law cited that allows this shifting of blame, and the governing law specifically prevents it. PA pharmacy governing law (PA27.12(b)(2)) ; 2. Whether Nebraska Board of Pharmacy violated the Plaintiff equal protection and due process rights by ignoring all of the Plaintiff's evidence of her ACTUAL INNOCENCE because she is Vietnamese? ;