Are the Due Process requirements of the Constitution violated when the state defrauds a litigant of fair notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE COURT FOR REVIEW: 1. Are the Due Process requirements of the Constitution of the United States violated when the state defrauds a litigant of fair notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard? 2. When the “notice” provided by the state amounts to a false, misleading, and/or fraudulent representation, has the litigant been denied “Fair Notice” as required by the Constitution of the United States? 3. Does the Collateral Judgment doctrine apply to judgments governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a)? If so, does the judgment appealed satisfy the Cohen test? 4. Was the judgment appealed herein procured through fraud or Deception? If so, was such fraud and/or Deception state action? : 5. Is an Order or Judgment procured through state action amounting to extrinsic fraud or conduct in the nature of extrinsic fraud, where the object of such fraud is to defraud a litigant of Due Process, void? 6. Did the trial court deny Appellant his Due Process Rights? . 2 . IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR CERTIORARI Petition, Matthew Tassone, respectfully prays that that a Writ of Certiorari issue for review of the Judgment below OPINION BELOW: The relevant trial court and appeals courts opinions are listed below in