No. 19-6864
Cedis R. Martin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: categorical-approach categorical-review crime-of-violence criminal-procedure due-process offense-of-violence sentencing-guidelines sentencing-predicate state-court-conviction statutory-interpretation u.s.s.g.-§4a1.1(e) vagueness vagueness-analysis vagueness-doctrine
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration Patent
Environmental Securities Immigration Patent
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a state court conviction qualify as an 'offense of violence' for sentencing purposes if the state offense can be committed without physical harm?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW IL Does a state court conviction qualify as an “offense of violence” for the purpose of the sentencing predicate pursuant to U.S.S.G.§4A1.1(e), if the state court offense can be committed without actual physical harm or threat of physical harm? i
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent