No. 19-6870
Kenny Brown v. Mental Health Rehabilitation
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech habeas-corpus standing
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Petitioner's First Amendment rights get violated by the repeated refusal to address his critical remarks, thus prejudicing the Petitioner's case?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED NEHOO =e =eoNRO LA: ie-Rehonemy en -bANt—o opel lal Ore | Did the Rebdonies Sho Wh US egng. Amond Cighls get Violttyd Lal lading " reped'tecl ” £0) loves D Add rere Wis cnticol rowds. thus ; Petitions Was ovin cess \y Presudrcee vud aonreg \Wheely, the Relitionsis Prose LAIsane ShOk ais Made “Repl dled y Memes 4p Advrnce, tS cise_ro, UWS, |
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2020)