Gregory Bartunek v. United States
DueProcess
Is an affirmative demonstration of prejudice to the accused's ability to defend himself essential to prove the denial of his right to a speedy trial?
No question identified. : . h . QUESTIONS I. IS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEMONSTRATION OF PREJUDICE TO THE ACCUSED'S . ABILITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF ESSENTIAL TO PROVE THE DENIAL OF HIS RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL? II. SHOULD THE COURT ALLOW HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF OR SIMILAR COLLATERAL : . RELIEF FOR A SPEEDY TRIAL CLAIM BROUGHT BEFORE TRIAL? DOES DENIAL OF SUCH A CLAIM, NOT BASED ON ITS-MERITS, VIOLATE THE PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS? ° ” oo -III. SHOULD "EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES" BE REQUIRED TO BRING FORWARD A HABEAS CLAIM, BASED ON A SPEEDY TRIAL VIOLATION, PRIOR TO TRIAL? ARE SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES PRESENT IN THIS CASE? SHOULD THE . PETITIONER'S WRIT FOR HABEAS THEN BE GRANTED? i .