Whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits warrantless GPS tracking of a vehicle, and whether the retroactive application of the Supreme Court's decision in Carpenter v. United States deprived the petitioner of due process

No question identified. : —_| _s Ue ion Lo S ia resented : al adidthe Fourth cih,dlenied revienz ah Lursase. to deprive Petition. ro howe, ute. Pbbenae je end todd to reldle | Ce bcirralve deprive bethan Due process ah putpas t theS. veme Coundat the United See cand dave juriwlehin aaccept lehiten mation tar wurtbohicertorar! because hebben ‘¢ eattles ta beled (3)adid: pechicert Violated MR. Ednaanchs fesurth amendaeat = ‘ Ads ween dey physically inteuded an Kdaadt Carta obtain ntokiaals pode astalling. a GbS clevlee wacthauba wlatcanh ata = J)_Z 4 nes case wataleeady retraachvely applied < awas the state and federal courtdecitian asians oof fen LAR = tea dM po ce Conduct may Lave run afoul af the fourth amen= Am eatin pablt constituted a search without awatant at the time fa the search the tule AA ala. poly event terval Onsel he slnoed ta Sapptass the epider ie abtititey Halas pe suppressiNe candle extant laussnchile the supreme courtal ch ad haldthatihe of a GPSdewce ana tal= get car 4 dts use ofthat device ta monitor the car lo= 22 ent Hanchbea a Search it-alid nat inake His, judgnoeat= Follows. loos sy the capreme courfat the hime: e GbS tracker was ipstafled-united Sales Veknatts= estahhcl,, d the fourth amendinent laac that permitted the = trackias ofa car by meancata mechanical deuzeah public= road.atay Kelly, 136 Maat VdS atthe time the Vikeinio, police attaches te Gbetiacherythnls lave was blade lh marylanle. Zeal Davis, BIS. CA IW 4.d 03-94 LOU), resultof | efPective assicdance of councel — (Dw. rial Caunsed invalue in Collusion wxth-allparhec be — gatcaling GpStrac king to assure aConiictohs @, cid thiear coundy police legally entred the bate alma rylanay wt Lawtattagd.and febhse cat (Dawas the State and teaderal courts buline was a labia, injustificwhian that there was ah ecrar well under aad and. Conprehe . in-exictas lau deyendany possibility for fale painaledl ol ggreement (lo) cil thle co baddrese GR tracks regard A rane daa : on (LDewas He low clearlestabhis iL elore MRe Lblmoande — MALOS_ ALICE tandsuppression phase.of b's thal took placeat the Hints ‘dlaande State Court convichon became tinal? (13), wak Petition actralinnocerce af Hese chimes © | | | | 4 | | _| . | | . | ; : Continue LO