Does the Pre-Diath Circuit Court of Appeals have jurisdiction to circumvent the statutory commands of 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(A), established by Congress, by denying a petitioner's request for authorization to file a second or successive application for writ of habeas corpus in the district court indefinitely, to prevent its timely filing as required by the 1-year statute of limitations of Section 2244(d)(1), in order to exclude a petitioner from his one, free-standing opportunity to wage a collateral attack?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1. Does Pre Diath Civeuit Cou) o¢ Appears ave jovrsdic Vion bo Civeumvent dre. dexbkuay Commands. of 2% 0.5.6. Jak (b)(S)\CO), estab\iohead ley Congvess, by. AeNoy srg. a Sekionevs Veques For AvMhov 2akion Yo File a Second ov Successive ; AVvPlicarion For Wuik o¢ \nabeas Conpus. iwokhe Aiskvick Covoyv mdepinikely, ‘eo Pveven* ibs Yamely Filing os VYequived vy Yre \yeor Sear.Vane o¢ SeeKon AANNCAICDCAD, aw over Yo exclode a. Der horev Evom his one, FieeShow ding OP~orhonity Yo Wage a Co\vatevel aback ? . &. Does Ye Vimy Civers Govuv o¥ Avy eas \nave \uvis Me vou Yo Giveumvent re Yexkual Commeondas o¢ 23 O.5.¢, JANN CH)(AILA, eshodb\ished Py .Congvess, by SovShi bu Ying ys OWN Av how dy im. Khe Place o¢ C\eovly established FeXeva\ law as derermined. by Whe Ovited Stakes Suyveme. Court, in Ouler ke nFowwy Wy lvence Phe. Ov>, Come oF a PeiWones likigalion in Violablon. ox. Whe Ove Pvocess owd Eque\ PvotecKon Clause 2