Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the state's actions

No question identified. : Sbho Ww -se RE xsiPda > av < 2. MPOecrvey 3.8 \o & ~W 3 € eeSyvzriagy MypHOpreEtHe shPesP Out y boebe2 ph hay . FP estes Soe AR EEC ES rei Reb & Be Ase ees Eo. f TES h eee Se CP eee ato Here ahea co Relat, ghad Fibs cat! AFR Foky,ES 8 Hct e RRaSR oS o EET REE ge SF s a eta & 75 BY Po ee oh eS peer ale _t & Sweeae Lees eage EP AS euaeP a eee eee 4 sEeR ets GRegerr. Sh ree nH? EB Be . a = WVAXwX?R + S _ Fee hE te he cig gS ELLECESS & a a4 a ey 23 8 ¢ Pe Sst years Z Sek Ot AD 3 © ESTP EOSIA S wre 3 ©, 2 rm) A : in . -_~ pip hha lees Beet Ee Ty LE SERRE S ee * af 3 » Oe w § 3 sue ene B Geir pnsees s3e55Fe8 73 SGT FA 38 a. See pad > folt te hes eQRF 45 2 7 4 , ee ee: Qi ee ig 5 E43 8 . R +? 4 a oe ote te oleh =P | ei ber Ret Tr egerne as eC Les oes 5 =” x3 are a § Re ayo € Pee eo F Bs ae toe S Po teh hE as Fe + She shee ear Cha mes Ey Ps eC elEE E 3 ROSE re RR pg SO SHES ae R 8 EF © 30° 4 Gc CC Oo + 2 recthier RReresh! fee fA C225 zAas, SEihoke G Yy ae +3 8 g 8 ¢ 9 vw Sa ae iS BY a Q we