Whether the federal criminal jurisdiction over the Pueblo of Sandia lands was terminated by the 2005 Pueblo Lands Act Amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether, when Congress relinquished all federal claims and extinguished all interest of the Pueblo of Sandia in privately held lands within pueblo boundaries, it terminated the basis for exercise of federal criminal jurisdiction and thereby “otherwise provided” within the meaning of the 2005 Pueblo Lands Act Amendment? IL. Whether the jurisdictional element of a charged crime is adequately proved by a district court “preliminary finding” that it has jurisdiction and a jury determination that the offense happened at a particular location. i NO. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2019 JEFFREY ANTONIO, Petitioner, VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. DECLARATION OF COUNSEL Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.2, I, Irma Rivas, Assistant Federal Public Defender for the District of New Mexico, declare under penalty of perjury that I am a member of the bar of this court and counsel for Petitioner Jeffrey Antonio and that I caused to be mailed a copy of the petition for writ of certiorari to this court by first class mail, postage prepaid, by depositing the original and ten copies in an envelope addressed to the Clerk of this Court, in the United States Post Office at 1135 Broadway Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico, at approximately p.m. on the 2" day of December 2019. Irma Rivas Attorney for Petitioner FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER 111 Lomas NW, Suite 501 Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 346-2489 irma_rivas@fd.org ii