Whether the court of appeals erred in upholding the admission of evidence that violated the hearsay rule and the defendant's confrontation rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. THE COURT OF APPEALS CLEARLY ERRED IN UPHOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT’S RULING ADMITTING EVIDENCE AT DEFENDANT?’S TRIAL WHICH VIOLATED BOTH THE HEARSAY RULE AND DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION II. THE COURT OF APPEALS CLEARLY ERRED IN UPHOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT’S FINDING OF JURISDICTION SOLEY BASED ON A DEPARTMENT OF STATE CERTIFICATION AND IN FAILING TO SUBMIT THE ISSUE OF JURISDICTION TO THE JURY ii