Is the legal definition of the term 'same transaction' unconstitutionally vague?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Is the legal defination of the term "same transaction" unconstitutionally vague? : 2. . How would two incidents seperated by four months constitute as the “same transaction?” 3. Why are the exact same issues of ultimate fact; which have previously been . determined by @ valid and final judgment, be able to be relitigated in a : . ” successive prosecution? 4. Would the conduct committed in an offense, which is the same exact conduct needed for proof to convict in a separate offense make both offenses the "same offense" within . 4. the meaning of the Double Jeopardy Clause? 5 5. Would one tribe which derives from surrounding original tribes still penefit from the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine? . 6. How does 4 non-original tribe or entity pe considered to have and wield “inherent” power if such power is "delegated" to them? , :