Whether an identification resulting from a show-up confrontation during a preliminary hearing raised by prior police activity is sufficient to warrant a court's evidentiary inquiry

No question identified. : QUESTIONS PAKSENTED T, Whether an idoukticakion reoultin4 fiom BOWL on One Confroomtakion dung a . preliminary hearing rained by Qnior Police Ackivily| i> Duffiaenrt ray Wartaut a CourkD se liaariry wqury . TL. Whewer a States failove aw meek whe Noprocal veguirements of i’ aliloi statute 1D 2 Violation of the Que Prowes Clause Whore a, delendant had alitady Complied Wir dhe Same mandatory Wejuitemends , PARTIES To TWE PROCEEDINGS AL Parkes appear im tne caphon of Ane Case of Ye Cover, Petitioner Peller Wiliam D. Thomas % an dividual and War wo Corporate affliations. il TABLE. OF CONTENTS QUESTIONS PAESENTED nn on PAATIES TOTHE PROCEEDINGS we TABLE. OF AUTKOAITIES ; Ww SUREDICTION ae OPINIONS BELOW ne. CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS — 4-2-3 SIATEMENT OF THE CASE -q PRASONS FOR GRMNTING THE WRIT iO-18 COMLUSION 18 AVPENDIX A United Sale Cous of Appeale foe tre Sth Crtuit Qomion United Gates Datnct Cook & i chic % Beno Aol oe Dr the Eastern, Delriek Mia yn C. Mekicamn Csuek of Nopeale, Opinion, Nevewlaer 10,Z0'5 : D. Preliminany Hearng “Transcript Excerpts Awl 14 ov. E. wal TWanseripka Excerets February 1G, 20H F. Motion Wearing “Transcript Excerpts Feotuary 10,2014 Cx. Nokon Year wie) Tamstripts Excerpt pauary 80, Zoid “PDO OF SERUICE i TABLE OF AUTHOAITIES | CASES PAGE NUMBER Footer v. Califoenia, 284 U2. Y¢(1169) id hennaugh v. Miller, 204 €3d aio, 47 (2d Gr 2e02) Moore vy. \Ilinais, 4H US .220 C1417) 2 Perry v. New Hampshire, S65 US. 226, 242201) \O Roe v. Travis, UH Mich 646 (1943) 1G United Dares V. Deming, 164 Fed (Gl, rue (WACr 968) i onited Shales v. Will, 467 Fad 2%, 232 (omar 1442) it United Shales Vv. Wiliams Udo Fed Hob, 108 (GaCr ato) AL Wardius v. Oregon, HI2 UD.470 GATS is STATUTES AND ALLES MCL$166-20 \S NOLS. 766-2L : is iV o\ JVALSDICTION : The United Stakes Coutt of Appeals for dhe Sixth Crrtuit denied petitioner's neguedt for 2 Cerkcfrogte oF Appealility on Puquet bo, 2014. The Courts Sprddickion of Was petition iS favoked Under 26 USA. 3 i254). OPINIONS BEL ow The Order of the Uwited Stakes Court of Appeals MAME Six Cireuit appears At Appondix A yo dhe petition IMS > Ungublighed, We Damion of ane United Stakes Distt Court appears AX Kpperdix B tp dna pekion and io unbublished. The dpinion of ave Michigan Court of Appeal appears Ft