No. 19-6937

Scherrieto Little v. Janis Nau, as Administrator

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-12-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-power attorney-ethics civil-procedure civil-rights due-process estate-fraud fraud judicial-misconduct legal-ethics probate probate-law rule-8.4
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. WHEN A VIOLATION OF CA RULE 8.4 (c) OCCUR, SHOULD THE HEIR 'S OF AN
ESTATE HAVE TO PAY FOR THE FRAUD, CORRUPTION, AND LIE'S THAT HAVE
BEEN COMMITTED AGAINST THEM, BY THE ATTORNEY 'S AND JUDGE 'S, THAT
ARE SUPPOSE TO BE WORKING FOR THEM, THIS IS A QUESTION FOR REVIEW?

2. DID THE PROBATE JUDGE ABUSE HIS POWER BY GRANTING ORDERS, THAT HE
KNEW WERE FRAUDLENT, BY TESTIMONY THAT WAS PRESENTED IN TRIAL BY
THE APPELLANT, AS WELL AS THE WITNESSES? CCP 657, 657.1,
C.P.C. SECTION 96.5

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a violation of CA Rule 8.4 (c) occur, should the heir's of an estate have to pay for the fraud, corruption, and lie's that have been committed against them, by the attorney's and judge's, that are suppose to be working for them, this is a question for review?

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-06
Waiver of right of respondent Janis Nau, Administrator to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Janis Nau, Administrator
Stefani B. Lenett — Stefani B. Lenett, Esq. A Professional Corporation, Respondent
Scherrieto Little
Scherrieto Little — Petitioner