No. 19-6950
Christopher Brian Rogers v. Tammatha Soss, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure darden-v-wainwright due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-v-ryan procedural-default prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-01-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the prosecutor's statements shifting the burden of proof to the defendant during closing arguments constituted prejudicial misconduct under Darden v. Wainwright
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2020-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-12-19
Waiver of right of respondent Tammatha Soss to respond filed.
2019-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Christopher Brian Rogers
Karyn Hilde Bucur — Suite E-193, Petitioner
Karyn Hilde Bucur — Suite E-193, Petitioner