No. 19-6959

Jasmine F. v. Department of Child Safety, et al.

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2019-12-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure clear-and-convincing-evidence constitutional-deficiency court-appointed-counsel due-process fourteenth-amendment parental-rights termination-of-parental-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the State of Arizona failed to terminate mother's parental rights by at least clear & convincing evidence as required by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether The State Of Arizona Failed To Terminate Mother’s Parental Rights By At Least Clear & Convincing Evidence As Required By The Due Process Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment? 2. Whether Mother’s Court-Appointed Counsel Was Constitutionally Deficient? 2. Whether The Termination Of Mother’s Parental Rights Was Erroneously Predicated Solely Upon The Children’s Best Interests In Violation Of The Due Process Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment? 1

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 15, 2020)

Attorneys

Jasmine F
Florence M. BruemmerLaw Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
Florence M. BruemmerLaw Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner