No. 19-6959
Jasmine F. v. Department of Child Safety, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure clear-and-convincing-evidence constitutional-deficiency court-appointed-counsel due-process fourteenth-amendment parental-rights termination-of-parental-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the State of Arizona failed to terminate mother's parental rights by at least clear & convincing evidence as required by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether The State Of Arizona Failed To Terminate Mother’s Parental Rights By At Least Clear & Convincing Evidence As Required By The Due Process Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment? 2. Whether Mother’s Court-Appointed Counsel Was Constitutionally Deficient? 2. Whether The Termination Of Mother’s Parental Rights Was Erroneously Predicated Solely Upon The Children’s Best Interests In Violation Of The Due Process Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment? 1
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Jasmine F
Florence M. Bruemmer — Law Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
Florence M. Bruemmer — Law Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner