Roland A. Prenatt v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Whether the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the accused the right to a speedy trial, and why the judge and attorney can waive this right against the accused's wishes?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |) TE the sixth amendenenyy a the US, conshitotion guarantees she aceuse the mehT to & Spaacly trial, Then why does the Dodge end Attorney Keel they have the cet! fo wacivt TH copinst the accuseals wishes? So . fron prople hove their nds violeted like this every ab oath he a Videtiad & thar bis unter Ane sits amend mest \ Does the judge hove he Caht to ignore the accused § % eat to pe and, sok Ihave & Farrebba Tnqyiry 9 ushen rf Gas requested’ a , » lewiyer Sails to fle a direct appr RB) TR the accusedds Y vj choos the accuse | coqyes tad by the ageysed, thus Why shed ra shed Ie teins bo Bile & baeled appeal | ye obfersey neegieaked to do iis jab by fibes dire Oppeol aha ih sas requested. by Hae ogeuseol' 4) tihy isnt the accuses attorney \ndd acrountoble for pot investigating ® insarsiy defense, dots tha. acrsed hos such a long WStory a mental hesbthh problems? ae _