No. 19-6966
Kyle A. Keys v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Tags: circuit-court-split due-process exhaustion-doctrine exhaustion-requirement fair-presentation federal-courts federal-habeas-corpus federal-review habeas-corpus standard-of-review state-court-remedies statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals correctly interpreted the 'fair presentation'/exhaustion requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals correctly interpreted the “fair requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the decision below and/or whether the Eleventh Circuit’s interpretation is in conflict with the standard adopted by this Court and other circuit courts of appeals. ii B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-30
Waiver of right of respondents Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2019-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2020)
2019-09-20
Application (19A303) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 13, 2019.
2019-09-13
Application (19A303) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 14, 2019 to December 13, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Kyle A. Keys
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Wesley Heidt — Respondent
Wesley Heidt — Respondent